Nick Burrello Net Worth

Nick Burrello Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How to Verify

Photo of Nick Burrello corporate executive / CFO of Stats Perform

Which Nick Burrello are we talking about?

Split-style image with corporate office and podcast/media desk symbolizing two different “Nick Burrello” contexts

Before diving into any net worth estimate, it helps to confirm you have the right person. As of April 2026, the most publicly identifiable Nick Burrello is a corporate executive: the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of Stats Perform, a global sports data and artificial intelligence company. Stats Perform's official leadership page lists Nick Burrello under its executive team in that CFO role. If you searched for Nick Burrello expecting an athlete, entertainer, or politician, this profile may not match your intent. There is no widely documented public figure by that exact name in sports, entertainment, or politics at this time. This article focuses on the Stats Perform CFO, since that is the only Nick Burrello with a verifiable, searchable public professional footprint right now.

It is worth noting that name disambiguation matters a lot when researching net worth. Confusing two people with similar names is one of the most common research errors in this space. If you are curious about other executives or personalities with a similar first name, profiles like Nick Buoniconti's net worth or Nick Begich Jr.'s financial profile cover entirely different people with their own distinct wealth-building trajectories. Make sure you have confirmed the right individual before drawing any conclusions.

The short answer: estimated net worth range

Nick Burrello's net worth is not publicly disclosed, which is typical for corporate executives who are not personally famous outside of their industry. Based on what we know about his role and the company he works for, a reasonable estimated range is $1 million to $5 million, with the most defensible midpoint estimate sitting around $2 million to $3 million as of early 2026. That range is not a confirmed figure. It is a structured estimate derived from publicly available signals about CFO compensation at comparable private technology and sports data companies, his seniority level, and typical wealth accumulation patterns for finance executives in that sector.

Stats Perform is a private company, which means there are no mandatory public financial disclosures for individual executives. That single fact is the biggest reason why any net worth figure you see for Nick Burrello should be treated as an informed estimate, not a confirmed number. The range above reflects realistic CFO compensation and asset accumulation at a mid-to-large private technology firm, not any specific salary filing or public record.

What drives his wealth: career and income sources

Close-up of a blurred finance dashboard on a tablet beside a generic executive credential badge

As CFO of Stats Perform, Nick Burrello's primary income source is his executive compensation package. At companies of Stats Perform's profile (a well-funded, globally operating sports data and AI firm with clients across major professional sports leagues and broadcasters), CFO compensation typically includes a base salary, an annual performance bonus, and potentially equity or profit-sharing arrangements tied to company performance or exit events. Base salaries for CFOs at similar private tech firms generally range from $250,000 to $500,000 per year, with total compensation (including bonuses and equity-linked payments) often pushing that figure considerably higher.

The sports data and analytics industry has grown rapidly over the past decade, and Stats Perform is one of its prominent players, having emerged from the merger of Perform Group's data business and Stats LLC. Executives who joined or advanced within the company during its growth phase may have accumulated equity or long-term incentive compensation that contributes meaningfully to net worth, particularly if there is ever a liquidity event like an acquisition or public offering. None of these specific arrangements for Nick Burrello are publicly confirmed, but they are standard wealth-building mechanisms for executives at his level.

It is also reasonable to assume that a senior finance executive with a CFO title has had a multi-decade career trajectory before reaching that role. Career income from prior positions (director-level, VP-level finance roles at earlier employers) would have contributed to savings, investment accounts, and other accumulated assets over time. Researchers looking at athletes with shorter high-income windows, like Nick Bjugstad's net worth or Nick Herbig's financial profile, are studying a very different wealth accumulation model compared to a career corporate finance executive.

Business ownership, investments, and other assets

There are no publicly available records indicating Nick Burrello has a personal business ownership stake, real estate portfolio, or investment holdings that he has disclosed publicly. That is not unusual for corporate executives at private companies who keep their personal finances private. However, the asset categories most likely to factor into his net worth include the following:

  • Equity or options in Stats Perform: CFOs at private equity-backed or venture-backed companies often receive equity grants. If Stats Perform undergoes a sale or IPO, this could meaningfully shift the net worth picture.
  • Retirement and investment accounts: A finance professional with 20-plus years of career income at competitive salaries would typically hold substantial 401(k), IRA, or brokerage account balances.
  • Real estate: Primary residence and potentially additional property, though no specific holdings are documented.
  • Prior employer equity: If Burrello held equity at any earlier employer that experienced a liquidity event, that could represent a prior wealth-building milestone not captured in current role compensation.

The absence of public disclosures does not mean these assets do not exist. It simply means researchers have to rely on industry norms and compensation benchmarks rather than direct evidence. This is a common situation for executives at private companies, and it is one of the main reasons net worth estimates for this category of professional carry wider uncertainty bands than those for publicly traded company executives or celebrities.

How net worth estimates are built (and why they vary)

Net worth estimates for private individuals like Nick Burrello are constructed from indirect signals rather than direct data. The general formula is straightforward: total assets minus total liabilities equals net worth. The hard part is that neither side of that equation is publicly available for most corporate executives who do not hold positions at publicly traded companies.

Researchers and reference sites typically estimate net worth by starting with known or inferred income (role-based salary benchmarks, industry compensation surveys, any disclosed earnings), then applying reasonable assumptions about savings rate, asset accumulation, and liabilities over a career timeline. That process introduces several points of variation, which is why you will often see different sites publish different numbers for the same person.

Estimation InputData Available for Nick BurrelloReliability
Job title and employerConfirmed (CFO, Stats Perform)High
Base salaryNot publicly disclosed; benchmarked from industry dataMedium
Bonus and equityNot disclosed; inferred from company type and stageLow to Medium
Real estate holdingsNot publicly documentedLow
Investment accountsNot publicly documentedLow
Prior career earningsNo public record availableLow

Different sites arrive at different numbers because they use different salary benchmarks, apply different savings-rate assumptions, or include or exclude speculative asset categories. Some sites also simply copy figures from other sites without independent research, which causes errors to compound. When you see wildly different estimates across sources, that inconsistency itself is useful information: it tells you the figure is not anchored to confirmed public data.

How to find and cross-check reliable sources

Minimal desk scene with laptop displaying a highlighted checklist-style verification workflow, no visible text.

For a corporate executive at a private company, verifiable sources are limited but not nonexistent. Here is a practical workflow for today (as of April 2026) if you want to go beyond a single estimate.

  1. Start with the company's official website: Stats Perform's leadership or team page confirms Burrello's role. This validates identity before you proceed with any financial research.
  2. Check LinkedIn: A professional profile, if public, can reveal career history, tenure at each employer, and any board memberships or advisory roles that signal additional income streams.
  3. Search financial news databases: Bloomberg, Crunchbase, and PitchBook sometimes include executive information tied to funding rounds or company transactions. Stats Perform's financing history may include executive mentions.
  4. Look for press releases and industry media: Stats Perform and its predecessors have issued press releases around hires, partnerships, and milestones. CFO appointments or quotes in financial media can anchor your timeline.
  5. Cross-check salary benchmarks: Use Glassdoor, Levels.fyi, or compensation surveys from financial services firms to benchmark CFO compensation at comparable private tech companies by revenue scale and geography.
  6. Check public records where applicable: Property records (county assessor databases), business entity filings (state secretary of state databases), and court records can surface real estate and business ownership data that is otherwise invisible.

When cross-checking, look for internal consistency. If a site claims a net worth of $10 million for a CFO at a mid-size private company with no disclosed equity event, that number deserves scrutiny. Compare it against what you find in compensation benchmarks and see if the gap is explainable. If it is not, treat that figure with skepticism. The same critical approach applies whether you are researching a corporate executive or a political figure like Nick Begich Jr., whose financial disclosures exist in a completely different format through public ethics filings.

Red flags and common mistakes to avoid

Researching net worth online comes with a consistent set of pitfalls. Here are the ones that trip up readers most often when looking up executives like Nick Burrello.

  • Trusting a single source without cross-checking: Many net worth sites publish round-number estimates ($1M, $5M, $10M) without sourcing. A figure that appears on only one site with no explanation of methodology should not be taken as fact.
  • Mistaking role prestige for confirmed wealth: Being a CFO signals high earning potential, but it does not confirm a specific net worth. Compensation varies enormously by company size, stage, and equity structure.
  • Confusing company valuation with personal net worth: Stats Perform is a well-known company in its industry, but the company's value does not translate directly to its CFO's personal net worth unless Burrello holds a significant equity stake and a liquidity event has occurred.
  • Using outdated figures: Net worth estimates can shift significantly with job changes, equity events, or market movements. Always check when a figure was last updated.
  • Identity confusion: Searching a common name like 'Nick Burrello' without confirming you have the right person can lead you to absorb financial data about a completely different individual. This is especially relevant given similar-sounding names in public life.
  • Assuming no disclosure means high secrecy: Most private executives simply have no obligation to disclose personal finances. Lack of public data is the norm, not a red flag.

One more mistake worth flagging: do not assume that because someone works in finance, their personal wealth management is especially sophisticated or that their net worth is disproportionately high. Finance executives earn well, but their net worth is still primarily a function of tenure, total compensation, and how much of that compensation has been saved and invested over time. The same fundamentals that apply to any professional apply here. If you find yourself comparing this kind of profile to an athlete's earnings, keep in mind that the wealth-building mechanics are quite different. For example, Nick Bultman's net worth reflects a career arc shaped by entirely different industry dynamics than a corporate CFO's trajectory.

Bottom line: what we know and what we are estimating

Nick Burrello is the CFO of Stats Perform, a global sports data and AI company. That is the confirmed, verifiable fact underpinning any financial profile of him. Everything else, including his exact salary, equity position, asset base, and personal liabilities, is either undisclosed or inferred from industry benchmarks. The most defensible net worth estimate for Nick Burrello as of April 2026 is in the range of $1 million to $5 million, with the midpoint likely closer to $2 million to $3 million, based on CFO compensation norms at comparable private technology companies and a reasonable assumption of asset accumulation over a senior finance career. If Stats Perform undergoes a major liquidity event, that range could shift substantially upward. Until then, treat any figure you encounter as an estimate, apply the cross-checking steps outlined above, and update your view if new public information emerges.

FAQ

How can I tell if a net worth site is mixing up Nick Burrello with someone else?

Check the job title and employer in the same page. If the site mentions an athlete, a politician, or a different company, it is likely a disambiguation error. Also verify whether it references the CFO role at Stats Perform, not just the name.

Why is the estimated range so wide, even if his CFO title is confirmed?

For private-company executives, the biggest missing piece is equity and liabilities. Many CFO total compensation packages include equity or long-term incentives that can swing net worth a lot, but those grants and their current value are not publicly available, so estimates rely on compensation benchmarks and assumptions.

What compensation signals should I look for to sanity-check a stated net worth number?

Look for any public statements that describe total compensation components, such as base salary, bonus structure, or retention and equity policy. If a net worth claim implies unusually high holdings but there is no plausible path through typical CFO compensation and tenure, treat it as unreliable.

Can an executive’s net worth estimate change significantly without any new salary information?

Yes. Market movements can revalue investments, and equity tied to private-company events can become liquid only when there is a sale, recapitalization, or IPO. A previously “reasonable” estimate can jump if a liquidity event occurs, even if salary stays the same.

Do CFOs at private companies usually have equity, and should that be included in net worth estimates?

Often they do, but it depends on the company’s incentive plan. For net worth research, you should treat equity as a probability-weighted factor rather than a confirmed asset. If a source presents equity as certain without evidence, it increases the chance the estimate is overstated.

What liabilities could materially affect his net worth estimate?

Common untracked liabilities include mortgages, personal loans, margin borrowing, and taxes due on incentive compensation. Because these are rarely disclosed for private-company executives, most public estimates focus on assets and ignore liabilities, which can systematically bias numbers upward or downward.

Is the midpoint estimate ($2 million to $3 million) likely, or is that just a guess?

It is a defensible midpoint based on typical CFO compensation and long-run saving and investing patterns, but it is still assumption-driven. The estimate is most credible when the implied accumulation matches realistic savings rates over a multi-decade finance career.

What would make me update the estimate upward or downward soon?

Upward triggers include credible reporting of major equity holdings, leadership promotions with larger incentive packages, or a documented liquidity event involving Stats Perform. Downward triggers are rarer publicly, but could include evidence of large personal debt, major divestment, or tax/settlement events that reduce net assets.

If I see a very high number, like $10 million or more, what quick checks should I do first?

Compare the implied timeline of asset growth to a typical CFO earning and investing profile. If the number requires equity liquidation or investment returns that are not plausible without a major liquidity event, flag it as speculative. Also check whether the source copied from another site without independent reasoning.

Could Nick Burrello have personal investments or a business stake that is not public?

Yes. Private-company executives often keep personal portfolios undisclosed. That is why estimates cannot rule out additional assets, but you should avoid treating unknown holdings as fact. The best approach is to keep the estimate range wide until any concrete evidence appears.

Next Articles
Steven Bancarz Net Worth: Estimate, Income Sources, and How to Verify
Steven Bancarz Net Worth: Estimate, Income Sources, and How to Verify

Steven Bancarz net worth estimate explained with income sources, wealth signals to verify, and accuracy limits.

Steven Basalari Net Worth Estimate Explained and Verified
Steven Basalari Net Worth Estimate Explained and Verified

Steven Basalari net worth estimate with verified sources, defensible range, and a checklist to confirm updates.

Stephen Budd Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How to Verify
Stephen Budd Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, and How to Verify

Stephen Budd net worth estimate with sources, income drivers, and a checklist to verify figures from public records.