Anthony J. Bettencourt is a Silicon Valley technology executive whose estimated net worth sits somewhere between $2 million and $18 million as of 2026, with the most credible publicly available data pointing to a figure closer to the $10–18 million range when you factor in his full career across multiple executive and director roles at companies like Verity, Coverity, Imperva, and Proofpoint.
Anthony Bettencourt Net Worth: Estimate, Sources, Timeline
Marcus Voss
3 May 2026
Which Anthony Bettencourt are we talking about?
Before getting into numbers, it's worth confirming who this profile is about. Multiple people named Anthony Bettencourt exist, and at least one public record names 'Anthony Bettencourt III,' so disambiguation matters here. The person most commonly surfaced in financial databases, SEC filings, and business press is Anthony J. Bettencourt, a technology executive based in the San Francisco Bay Area. He served as CEO of Verity, then CEO and Chairman of Coverity, then President, CEO, and Chairman of Imperva (IMPV), and also appears in SEC filings as a director and early shareholder at Proofpoint (PFPT). All of the net worth research on this page refers to this individual, specifically as documented through his SEC insider filings and executive compensation records.
The net worth estimate: what the numbers actually show
Two credible financial data sources have published estimates for Anthony J. Bettencourt based on SEC insider ownership data. GuruFocus, which derives its estimates from Form 4 filings and values holdings at current or most recent share prices, lists a floor of 'at least $2 million' as of March 2026, based specifically on his documented stake of roughly 10,112 shares in Proofpoint. Benzinga's insider trades tracker puts the estimate considerably higher at $18.2 million, pulling in reported share positions across multiple companies including Imperva, Proofpoint, and others. The gap between those two figures isn't a contradiction; it reflects different methodologies and different snapshots in time. The realistic working range, accounting for equity compensation across a multi-decade executive career, is roughly $10 million to $18 million.
It's important to flag what these estimates do and don't capture. SEC-based estimates only count shares that were publicly reported through insider filings. They don't include cash savings, private investments, real estate, or any equity that was sold and reinvested elsewhere. So the real number could be higher. On the other hand, stock positions fluctuate with market prices, so the dollar value attached to any share count changes constantly. The $2 million floor from GuruFocus is essentially just the documented share value at one point in time, not a complete picture of wealth.
Where his wealth most likely comes from
Anthony Bettencourt's career follows the pattern common among successful tech executives of his generation: take equity-heavy C-suite roles at venture-backed or publicly traded companies, ride growth cycles, collect compensation packages that include salary, bonuses, and stock grants, and build wealth through a combination of exits and ongoing share ownership. His documented career spans at least three major companies where he held CEO-level authority, each of which represents a potential wealth-building event.
Executive compensation at Imperva
Imperva was a publicly traded cybersecurity company (NASDAQ: IMPV), and SEC filings from the company's proxy and 10-K materials include compensation tables naming Bettencourt with salary, bonus, and total compensation figures. As President and CEO from August 2014 through 2017, and as Chairman of the Board for part of that period, he would have received market-rate executive compensation for a mid-cap cybersecurity company, typically structured as base salary plus annual incentive bonuses plus multi-year equity grants in the form of restricted stock units or stock options. He stepped down from the Imperva board in February 2018, per an SEC-filed press release, which suggests he did not benefit from the company's eventual acquisition by Thales Group in 2019 as an active insider, though any shares he held at departure would have carried value.
Equity from Coverity and Verity
Before Imperva, Bettencourt served as CEO and Chairman of Coverity, a software quality and security testing firm, from late 2010 onward. A Forbes interview from December 2011 corroborates his leadership there. Prior to that, he led Verity, an enterprise search software company, through its acquisition by Autonomy Corporation in 2005. CEO-level exits through acquisitions typically involve equity payout for executives holding shares or options, and Verity's acquisition by a major software buyer would have been a meaningful liquidity event for someone in his role.
Director roles and share ownership
Beyond operating roles, Bettencourt held director positions that also came with equity. SEC filings from Proofpoint's S-1/A list him as a Founder, Chairman, and Director, and proxy materials show a documented holding of 62,500 shares at 0.17% ownership. He was also listed as a director of Imperva in the SEC insider ownership context tracked by GuruFocus. Board director roles at public tech companies typically include annual equity grants as part of director compensation, adding to accumulated share positions over time.
The public records behind these estimates
Every estimate on this site is only as good as the public records it draws from. For Anthony Bettencourt, here are the specific document types that form the evidentiary backbone of this profile:
- SEC Form 4 filings: These are insider transaction reports that executives and directors at public companies must file when they buy or sell shares. They're the primary raw material for sites like GuruFocus and Benzinga when calculating insider-based net worth estimates.
- SEC proxy statements (DEF 14A): Imperva's 2016 proxy, for example, includes a vote to elect Anthony Bettencourt as a director. These filings also typically contain compensation tables showing salary, bonuses, and equity grant values for named executive officers.
- SEC Form 10-K: Imperva's 2016 annual report was signed by Bettencourt in his capacity as Principal Executive Officer, corroborating his active role and providing context for compensation-level estimates.
- SEC Form 8-K: The August 2017 8-K filing documents a leadership transition at Imperva involving Bettencourt, and the February 2018 press release filed with the SEC confirms his departure from the board.
- SEC S-1/A registration statements: Proofpoint's S-1/A lists Bettencourt as Founder, Chairman, and Director, which establishes early equity ownership in a company that later went public.
- Company press releases filed with the SEC: The August 2014 Imperva press release and the November 2010 Coverity press release both document his executive appointments and prior career history.
- Financial data aggregators: GuruFocus and Benzinga compile and cross-reference the above filings to generate estimated net worth figures with explicit methodology disclosures.
These aren't guesses. They're inferences drawn from legally required public disclosures. The limitation is that they only capture what the law requires companies and insiders to disclose, which is a subset of total personal wealth.
Career and wealth timeline: key milestones
| Year / Period | Event | Wealth Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-2005 | CEO of Verity, Inc. | Built equity position at a publicly traded enterprise software company |
| 2005 | Verity acquired by Autonomy Corporation | Likely liquidity event for equity held as CEO; acquisition exits typically trigger payout for C-suite shareholders |
| 2006 | Joins Avolent board as 'Anthony Bettencourt III' | Early board role post-Verity; small but signals ongoing advisory/director compensation |
| Late 2010 | Named CEO, President, and Chairman of Coverity | New equity grant cycle begins at a VC-backed software security company |
| 2011 | Featured in Forbes as Coverity CEO | Corroborates active leadership; compensation and equity accumulation ongoing |
| August 2014 | Appointed President, CEO, and Chairman of Imperva (NASDAQ: IMPV) | Major wealth driver: publicly traded company, market-rate executive pay, equity grants |
| 2016 | Signs Imperva's 10-K as Principal Executive Officer; elected to board via shareholder vote | Peak of Imperva tenure; proxy filings begin showing compensation detail |
| August 2017 | Leadership transition at Imperva; moves to VP of Customer Engagement role per 8-K | Signals transition out of top executive role; equity vesting schedules may have shifted |
| February 2018 | Steps down from Imperva board | Departure locks in whatever equity had vested; no further insider accumulation at Imperva |
| 2026 (current) | Documented holdings: ~10,112 shares in Proofpoint per GuruFocus (value over $2M floor) | Residual public equity documented; total estimated range $10M–$18M |
Assets and liabilities that shape the estimate
On the asset side, the documented holdings in Proofpoint are the most visible piece. Proofpoint was taken private by Thoma Bravo in a $12.3 billion deal in 2021, which means publicly traded share data for PFPT is no longer updated in the same way. Any shares Bettencourt held in Proofpoint at the time of that acquisition would have been cashed out at the deal price unless he rolled them into the private entity. His earlier Imperva shares, if held through 2019, would have been converted at Thales Group's acquisition price. Beyond documented shares, a tech executive with this career profile would typically hold cash savings, retirement accounts, and potentially real estate in the Bay Area, though none of these are part of the publicly documented picture.
On the liability side, there's essentially no public data. Mortgages, loans, or other obligations don't appear in SEC filings for executives who aren't also major shareholders subject to Schedule 13D/13G reporting. That gap in the data is a real limitation of any estimate built from public records alone. The net worth figures cited here should be understood as an estimate of documented financial assets, not a verified accounting of total net worth after liabilities.
How to read and verify these net worth figures
Net worth estimates for executives like Anthony Bettencourt are useful reference points, not audited financial statements. GuruFocus explicitly notes its estimate 'may not reflect the actual net worth,' and that caveat applies to every figure on this page and on similar reference sites. Here's how to think about the numbers and verify them yourself if you want to dig deeper.
- Check the SEC EDGAR database directly. Search 'Anthony Bettencourt' in the full-text search or by CIK number to pull Form 4 filings, proxy statements, and annual reports where his compensation and share ownership are disclosed. This is the primary source for any credible estimate.
- Cross-reference financial aggregators. Sites like GuruFocus and Benzinga pull from the same SEC filings but may use different share price snapshots. If the two sources give different numbers, the difference usually comes down to timing or which holdings they chose to include.
- Look for acquisition context. Both Imperva and Proofpoint were acquired by large private equity or corporate buyers. Executives holding shares at acquisition typically received cash payouts. These events are documented in SEC merger-related filings (S-4, 8-K) and can help you estimate what a particular share position was worth at exit.
- Adjust for time. This profile was researched in May 2026. Stock prices, private equity valuations, and any new director roles Bettencourt may have taken on after 2018 could change the picture. If you're reading this significantly after that date, the figures may need updating.
- Treat the range as a floor. The $2 million GuruFocus floor is a documented minimum based on one share position. The $18.2 million Benzinga figure incorporates more holdings across his career. Neither includes private assets, real estate, or proceeds from stock sales reinvested elsewhere, so the true figure is likely at or above the higher estimate, not below the lower one.
For context, profiles of other executives and notable figures on this site follow the same methodology: build from SEC and public business records, acknowledge what's missing, and present a documented range rather than a false precision number. If you're curious about comparable profiles, similar research approaches apply to figures like Anthony Zerbe or Anthony Bucci, where the available public data shapes both what can be confirmed and what remains estimated. The zErb net worth figures are usually derived from documented public filings and reported insider ownership, then adjusted for market price movements over time. If you’re also looking for Brighton Zeuner net worth, the same approach applies: check SEC and other public disclosures, then compare how different trackers value the underlying holdings. Anthony Bucci net worth is often discussed in similar terms, using publicly available records to estimate a range of wealth. If you are also looking into Anthony Zerbe net worth, the best starting point is the same kind of publicly documented filings and credible databases used for other executive wealth estimates.
FAQ
How can I be sure the net worth estimate is for the correct Anthony Bettencourt?
Yes, but only if you can confirm the exact person tied to the filings. “Anthony Bettencourt” can refer to multiple individuals, including at least one with “III” in public records. Before trusting any share count, match identifiers like middle initial, location (Bay Area), and company role timing (Verity, Coverity, Imperva, Proofpoint) to the Form 4 or proxy documents you are using.
Why do net worth trackers publish different values at different times for the same person?
Those estimates are usually anchored to documented insider share ownership, then multiplied by a share price at the time of valuation. If share prices rise or fall after an insider filing, the implied net worth moves even if the share count stays the same. Also, if the person sells shares between filings, the value estimate can lag until the next reported transaction.
What parts of wealth are likely missing from SEC-insider-based net worth estimates?
Not directly. SEC-based approaches generally capture publicly reported insider holdings and transactions, but they do not reliably include private investments, fully private companies, retirement plan assets, or real estate. A person can also have wealth from equity grants they sold, then reinvested elsewhere, which would not show up as current insider shares.
Do these net worth numbers account for debts like mortgages or loans?
The biggest “missing piece” risk is liabilities, because public insider filings typically do not provide a full balance sheet. Unless someone is subject to special reporting thresholds that reveal additional context, mortgages and other debts are often invisible in public datasets. That means the cited figure is closer to “value of documented assets” than true net worth after obligations.
How do acquisitions and going-private events affect insider-based net worth calculations?
Acquisition events can significantly change how much of the portfolio is captured by later public filings. For example, if holdings were in a public company that later went private or got acquired, the publicly traded share data stops being updated, and the value may instead reflect a one-time cashout at the deal price (unless rolled into the new entity).
Can the current reported share count understate someone’s past wealth-building?
Yes, but usually only within a limited and documentable window. If the person sold shares right after an equity award or during a scheduled selling period, the remaining holdings in later filings may be smaller, even if total lifetime wealth was much higher. That is why two people with similar current share counts can have very different wealth histories.
What changes after a company like Proofpoint is taken private (PFPT), and how might that impact estimates?
If Proofpoint went private, there may be fewer or no new public price references for the same shares, which can make valuation methodology more conservative or inconsistent across trackers. In practice, some sites estimate using deal-price references or last known public valuation, which can create a mismatch between methodologies.
What’s a quick way to sanity-check an estimate from a net worth tracker?
One practical approach is to compare at least three data points: (1) the most recent Form 4 share counts or option exercises you can verify, (2) how the tracker values those shares (last price, most recent price, or deal price if no longer public), and (3) whether the tracker includes indirect ownership or only directly reported holdings. If you see huge differences, look for those methodological differences first.
How should I interpret the “$10 million to $18 million” type range versus a single precise number?
Expect a range rather than a single number, and treat it as “documented equity value at a snapshot in time.” The article already notes that documented holdings exclude other assets, and liabilities are largely unobserved, so the true net worth could be higher or lower. If you need tighter precision, you would need more than public insider data, such as verified personal statements or comprehensive asset and debt records.
Next Articles
Anthony Bucci Net Worth: How to Estimate It Step by Step
Step-by-step method to estimate Anthony Bucci net worth using career, assets, liabilities, and source reliability.
Anthony Zerbe Net Worth: How Estimates Are Built
Learn how Anthony Zerbe net worth estimates are built using public records, income history, and asset verification steps
Steven Bancarz Net Worth: Estimate, Income Sources, and How to Verify
Steven Bancarz net worth estimate explained with income sources, wealth signals to verify, and accuracy limits.